REMI

Duty to accommodate versus condo rules

Deborah Howden, Partner, Shibley Righton LLP's Condominium Law Group
Tuesday, January 7, 2014

What is a condominium corporation’s duty to accommodate a resident?

Certain residents communicate a need for accommodation in relation to any one of the five social areas covered by the Ontario Human Rights Code. And where the accommodation request relates to a ground of discrimination listed in the Code, then the condominium corporation must do whatever is necessary to accommodate the person, short of undue hardship. For condominiums, the most relevant social areas are services, goods and facilities, and housing accommodation.

Under section 2(1) of the Code, “Every person has a right to equal treatment with respect to the occupancy of accommodation without discrimination because of race, ancestry, place of origin, ethnic origin, citizenship, creed, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, age, marital status, family status, disability or the receipt of public assistance.” Section 1 of the legislation also provides that every person has a right to equal treatment with respect to services, goods and facilities, without discrimination, on the basis of similar grounds.

Thus, accommodation in a condominium law context involves removing individual barriers that prevent residents (or potential residents) from accessing condominium services and facilities, or prevent them from occupying a unit in the building. These accommodation measures may include improving accessibility, acquiring or modifying the common elements, providing support or assistance, or tolerating some breaches of the condominium bylaws or rules.

The duty to accommodate has two steps. First, the procedural component requires the condominium corporation to obtain all relevant information about the resident’s needs, and to consider how it may meet its accommodation obligation. Second, the substantive component necessitates that the condominium corporation take active steps to put the accommodation in place, short of undue hardship, so as to avoid discrimination.

In a condominium setting, the obligation to accommodate usually involves disability. In Ontario, one in seven people has a disability, and this number is expected to rise steadily over the next 20 years as the population ages. By 2031, more than six million Ontarians will either be living with a disability, or will be 55 years of age and over. Not surprisingly, accommodation of disabled residents will be the primary accommodation issue for boards and property managers in the future.

Some directors and property managers are under the mistaken belief that accommodation obligations apply only to unit owners. If a condominium corporation’s declaration restricts the availability of handicapped parking units to disabled owners, for example, some may assume there is no duty to provide an appropriate parking space to a disabled tenant of the building. This is not so. The Code makes no such distinction between owners and other full-time residents.

Where there is conflict between the Code and the condominium corporation’s declaration, bylaws or rules, these may be overridden by the obligations imposed by the Code. The Code is human rights legislation with quasi-constitutional status and has paramountcy over other laws or rules.

Deborah Howden is a lawyer and partner in Shibley Righton LLP’s Condominium Law Group. She is a labour and employment law specialist who regularly advises condominium corporations and property management companies.

5 thoughts on “Duty to accommodate versus condo rules

  1. Question – Is replacing an existing door closer to a condo suite/unit to one that supports the suite door remaining open a few seconds longer considered a necessary accommodation for a handicapped owner? The door and closer are considered common area elements. Has anyone had this situation

  2. I have macular degeneration (ARMD) in my left eye and balance issue due to a spinal fusion I had in 2011. I am currently at the falls clinic I own a condo in Oshawa but cannot access it because it only has one sidewalk for 27 units and I am on ground floor at end, To access it from parking lot I would have to walk up a small hill, Does the condo corp have a duty to accommodate me . My daughter who is a co-owner lives there now. I am 73.

  3. Due to my permanent disabilities (4 herniated disks, bi-lateral hip Trochanteric Bursitis, bilateral ankle Osteochondritis Dissecans, PTSD, etc.) I live with a lot of pain, and requested that our condo corporation not reinstall the spring-to-fall, high speed bumps again this year, due to the exacerbation of physical pain they cause. (they were originally installed years ago when, in the past, for a short period of time, there was one resident/family with children).
    The boards of directors held a vote this spring and reinstalled them this year, despite my request. We are an adult/senior complex of three buildings, 72 units, with more residents with permanent disabilities.
    The board is aware of people in pain, trying to carefully navigate the bumps. They say they are following the condo rules. Their decision has resulted in me not leaving my home unless for groceries. My joy is gone. What is my next step?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

In our efforts to deter spam comments, please type in the missing part of this simple calculation: *Time limit exceeded. Please complete the captcha once again.